 |
A primary mission
for the MH-60R helicopter: locate submarines |
Daniel H. Wagner Associates is a
consulting firm that develops mathematical models and software
implementations of those models to aid a wide range of clients in
solving challenging operational problems. The Department of Defense (DoD)
is at the top of the firm's client list. Other important client sectors
include the financial industry, the health industry, the transportation
industry and the oil and gas industry.
Headquartered in Malvern, Pa., the firm has branch offices in Hampton
and Vienna, Va. Wagner Associates is an employee-owned company.
Approximately half of the technical staff holds Ph.D.s in the
mathematical sciences. The employees are the single greatest asset of
Wagner Associates, and the company is structured to provide maximum
benefits to the staff. Technical and career growth is encouraged and
supported both conceptually and financially. In addition to tuition
assistance, the company provides professional leave of up to seven days
a year to encourage professional activities, such as writing journal
articles, participating in professional societies, refereeing papers and
attending conferences.
The firm was founded by Daniel H. Wagner in 1963 with the corporate
goal of combining the power of mathematical theory with operational
experience to address the increasingly complex problems encountered in
naval operational analysis. Dan Wagner was a pioneer in naval
operational analysis and brought an innovative philosophy to his
fledgling company: hire the best mathematical talent possible and let
them learn the applied side on the job. The company continues this
tradition to this day, with proven success. In honor of his significant
accomplishments and contributions to the field of operations research,
CPMS: The Practice Section of INFORMS, offers the Wagner Prize for
Excellence in Operations Research Practice. |
|
Search Theory
A major strength of
the company is in the area of search theory, the optimal allocation of
search effort/resources when attempting to locate or detect an object.
Throughout the years, Wagner Associates has advanced this field in both
the theoretical and the applied realm. Famous examples of the
application of search theory involving Wagner Associates participation
include: the 1966 search for an H-bomb lost by the U.S. Air Force near
Palomares, Spain; the 1968 search for the sunken nuclear attack
submarine USS Scorpion (SSN-589); the search and recovery operation
after the space shuttle Challenger accident; and the search for the SS
Central America, an 1857 treasure ship that sunk off the Carolinas in a
hurricane, whose discovery returned more than $400 million in gold.
Of course there are other important applications of search theory.
For example, Wagner Associates used search theory to develop the first
computer-assisted search-planning tool (CASP), which was used by the
U.S. Coast Guard in planning and conducting search and rescue (SAR)
efforts. One interesting feature of SAR is that in some search-and-
rescue operations, the goal becomes to minimize the time to locate the
object (e.g. man overboard in frigid waters) rather than to maximize the
probability of finding the desired object.
In the military arena, search theory comes into play when attempting
to determine, or maintain knowledge of, enemy location and status. This
applies whether one is trying to optimally schedule the use of radar
energy to detect incoming ballistic missiles as early as possible or
placing sonobuoys in the water to assure that an enemy submarine cannot
get within torpedo range of a carrier battle group undetected. When the
object under search is actively seeking to avoid detection, a
game-theoretic approach may provide the best solution. Recently, Wagner
Associates developed a genetic algorithm based tool, the Operational
Route Planner (ORP), that is used in the U.S. Navy Undersea
Warfare-Decision Support System (USW-DSS) to plan search routes for
anti-submarine warfare (ASW), and that takes target-reaction-to-search
operations into account.
Data Fusion and Target Tracking
Related to search theory
is another area of research, data fusion. Humans are easily able
to integrate their own organic sensory information in order to obtain an
accurate picture of the world around them. Automatically fusing the data
from operational sensing systems (radar, passive and active sonar,
cameras, seismic sensors, etc.) to achieve situational or tactical
awareness of the surroundings poses a difficult challenge even with
today's powerful computers. Wagner Associates has been involved in the
tracking of military targets since its inception. Even the simple
problem of tracking a target with radar falls under the heading of data
fusion. One must correlate the radar detections from one scan of data to
the next, and then extract from the set of correlated detections as much
information about the target state as possible. The Kalman Filter is the
classic method for estimating the kinematic state from sensor data.
Additional knowledge can be inferred from the observed trajectory over
time (e.g., civilian airliners don't make 3-G turns).
When multiple heterogeneous sensors need to be fused, and when the
goal is to infer from the data a higher level of knowledge
(relationships, intent), data fusion begins to intersect with a wealth
of mathematical fields. Probability and stochastic processes play a
fundamental role in the basic kinematic estimation. For example,
Bayesian statistics, often implemented as Bayesian Networks, can be used
to estimate target classification/identity, and graph theory can be used
for associating data across multiple sensor frames. In addition, a
variety of new analytical tools can also come into play: neural
networks, fuzzy logic, evidential reasoning, support vector machines,
etc.
From R&D to Deployment
Although much of the
work performed at Wagner Associates is basic research, many of our
projects lead to operational systems that prove successful in the field.
Oftentimes, theoretical advances made in a number of projects over a
period of years combine to produce a single, highly advanced software
product or module. A perfect example of this process is the acoustic
mission planner (AMP), developed for the Navy's new MH-60R Seahawk
Multi-Mission Helicopter under a multimillion dollar subcontract to
Lockheed Martin Systems Integration-Owego.
One of the primary missions for the MH-60R is to locate submarines,
and it uses both passive and active sonobuoys and a dipping airborne low
frequency sonar (ALFS) to accomplish this task. AMP assists the MH-60R
crew in planning its anti-submarine missions, recommending ALFS dipping
sonar times and locations and optimal passive and active sonobuoy
patterns. AMP is embedded in the MH-60R avionics software and also in
the shipboard mission planning station (MPS).
There are two keys to AMP's high level of performance. The first is
the use of Wagner's non-Gaussian tracking engine (NGTE) to provide the
best possible probabilistic estimate of the submarine's location. The
NGTE is a non-Gaussian tracker that uses Monte Carlo target motion
models and Bayesian statistical models to generate a space-time target
probability distribution that is updated in real-time for both
"positive: contact reports and "negative" search information from
non-detection of the submarine. NGTE also uses estimates of target
tactics and the presence of obstacles (such as land in the case of
locating a submarine) to accurately project target location into the
future based on the fusion of all available data. The second key is a
search optimization algorithm that takes the target location information
generated by NGTE, combines this data with in-situ sensor performance
estimates, and then optimizes the employment of the dipping sonar and
passive and active sonobuoys using a global optimization scheme based on
Brown's algorithm, along with a local heuristic for flight path
selection.
In operational use, the AMP optimizer computes a complete route with
sensor locations, depths and operating modes for the helicopter at the
beginning of the mission. Each deployment of the dipping sonar, or of an
expendable bathythermograph (XBT), returns environmental data that is
used to improve the accuracy of the sensor performance estimate. Based
on this new data, the embedded system reruns the optimization algorithm,
improving overall mission performance in the latter portion of the
search.
Mathematical Finance
One of the recurring
surprises of mathematics is how seemingly unrelated problems have
mathematically related solutions. For example, the same class of
stochastic differential equations used to model the physical motion of
vehicles for the DoD can be used to model the "motion" of prices of
various financial instruments. Wagner Associates uses these and other
mathematical finance methods to develop trading systems that exploit
statistical arbitrage opportunities for the benefit of our client
investment firms.
Out of its long history of finance consulting experiences, Wagner
Associates has developed numerous computer models for quantifying
financial risk as well as stand-alone mathematical finance software
products. The Retirement Spending Planner (RSP) tool uses Monte Carlo
techniques (similar to those used in NGTE) to analyze and recommend
retirement planning strategies for individuals. A classic example of Sam
Savage's "Flaw of Averages" is the retirement plan that on average
results in a comfortable lifestyle until one's presumed demise at age
95, but that has a 25 percent chance of going broke before age 85. RSP,
used by both individuals and certified financial planners, permits a
probabilistic analysis that can accurately take into account future
uncertainties. Another product, M-V Optimizer, uses mean-variance
optimization methods to construct investment portfolios that maximize
expected return subject to a user specified constraint on risk.
In summary, the Wagner Associates company handbook states, "Our staff
is decidedly our most important asset. Therefore, a primary corporate
goal of the firm is to build and maintain a highly talented and
motivated staff and to provide them opportunities to grow
professionally." We accomplish this goal by choosing to work on the most
challenging problems, by seeking partnerships with universities and
government labs, by encouraging innovative thinking and academically
oriented activities, and by maintaining the high standards of research
excellence set by our founder, Daniel H. Wagner.
C. Allen Butler is the president
of Daniel H. Wagner Associates.
All About the Roundtable
INFORMS has two types of members: individual
and institutional. The latter (usually a
company) joins by joining the INFORMS
Roundtable and appointing as its
representative the person in overall charge
of O.R.
The Roundtable has been very active since
its founding in 1982, with three meetings
each year and much communication in between.
It, its member institutions and its member
representatives take a strong interest in
how INFORMS serves the needs of
practitioners, and have undertaken many
initiatives and provided many services
toward this end. These involve, for example,
public awareness of O.R., both of the annual
INFORMS conferences, continuing professional
education, one of the prizes and various
committees.
In addition, the Roundtable has an
advisory responsibility to INFORMS. One
bylaw states that it "... shall regularly
share with INFORMS leadership its views, its
suggested initiatives and its implementation
plans on the important problems and
opportunities facing operations research and
the management sciences as a profession and
on the ways in which INFORMS can deal
proactively with those problems and
opportunities ..." By tradition, it meets
with the newly elected INFORMS
president-elect each spring to discuss
practice-related topics of interest to him
or her, and with the entire INFORMS Board
each fall to discuss topics of mutual
concern.
The Roundtable membership comprises about
50 organizations. Further information is
available at
http://roundtable.informs.org.
This series of articles aims to share
with the INFORMS membership at large some
information and insights into how O.R. is
carried on in practice today. |
|
www.orms-today.com |
|